吉林省人民政府关于印发人民群众建议评审奖励制度的通知
作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-07-08 21:23:31 浏览:8588
来源:法律资料网
吉林省人民政府关于印发人民群众建议评审奖励制度的通知
吉林省人民政府
吉政发〔2002〕24号
吉林省人民政府关于印发人民群众建议评审奖励制度的通知
各市州、县(市)人民政府,省政府各厅委、各直属机构:
现将《吉林省人民政府关于人民群众建议评审奖励制度》印发给你们,请认真按照执行。
二○○二年七月九日(刊登《吉林日报》)
吉林省人民政府关于人民群众
建议评审奖励制度
为了更好地贯彻“三个代表”的重要思想,践行为人民谋利益的根本宗旨,落实“为民执政、科学理政、依法行政、从严治政”的施政方针,在转变作风年中切实改进思想作风和工作作风,拓宽联系群众的渠道,充分集中民智、反映民意,调动广大人民群众推进和实现吉林省跨越式发展的积极性、创造性,决定实行人民群众建议评审奖励制度。
一、鼓励人民群众对政府工作建言献策。要把听取人民群众的建议作为践行宗旨、改进作风的实际行动,作为科学民主决策的重要内容,作为政府工作的一项基本职责,纳入政府工作日程。各级政府和部门都要以各种方式和形式,认真倾听和积极采纳人民群众的建议,广开兴省之言,广谋富民之策。
二、开展人民群众建议征集活动。省政府热忱欢迎和积极鼓励广大人民群众和社会各界围绕全省改革开放、经济社会发展和政府自身建设等各个方面的工作提出建议。围绕中心工作,还可以就某一方面的重点、难点、热点问题,专题征集人民群众的建议。广大人民群众和社会各界可以利用“118”省长公开电话、省政府公众信息网、电子信箱,通过电话、来信、电子邮件等各种形式,对政府工作提出建议。
三、省政府成立人民群众建议评审奖励委员会。评审奖励委员会主任、副主任由省政府领导担任,成员由省政府有关部门负责人和省政府智力支撑体系有关专家组成。评审奖励委员会办公室设在省政府办公厅(省长公开电话办公室),负责日常活动组织和具体办理工作。
四、认真研究和积极采纳人民群众的建议。对收到的人民群众的建议,先由省政府评审奖励委员会办公室(省长公开电话办公室)进行登记、分类,提交有关部门和地区办理。有关部门和地区要认真研究,提出意见,并向省长公开电话办公室反馈。对其中的重要建议的采纳情况,省长公开电话办公室要及时向省政府有关领导报告。
五、实行评审制度。省政府对人民群众建议每年评审奖励一次。对进入省政府决策,或被省直部门和各地采纳并产生重要作用的群众建议,先由省长公开电话办公室汇总人民群众建议采纳情况,提出初步意见。由省政府人民群众评审奖励委员会按照“公开、公平、公正”的原则,讨论研究确定。
六、给予表彰奖励。对进入政府决策并产生重要作用的人民群众建议的表彰奖励设一、二、三等奖。其中:一等奖为进入省政府决策,对推动全省经济社会发展有重大作用的建议;二等奖为进入省政府部门和地区决策,对推动全省经济社会发展有重要作用的建议;三等奖为纳入省政府部门和地区工作,对推动全省经济社会发展有积极作用的建议。省政府对获奖建议,发放证书和奖金。
七、建立人民群众建议奖励基金。按每年评审奖励一次的要求,由省财政拨专款50万元,设立人民群众建议奖励基金,专项用于人民群众建议奖励。
八、本制度自印发之日起实施。
最高人民法院研究室关于刑事被告人上诉后脱逃在程序上如何处理问题的电话答复
最高人民法院研究室
最高人民法院研究室关于刑事被告人上诉后脱逃在程序上如何处理问题的电话答复
1987年1月6日，最高法院研究室
安徽省高级人民法院：
你院法研字（86）第15号《关于刑事被告人上诉后脱逃在程序上应当如何处理问题的请示报告》收悉。经研究，答复如下：
刑事被告人上诉后，在第二审法院审理期间，被告人脱逃的，第二审法院可以决定中止审理。中止审理的时间，不计算在案件审理期限内，待其被追捕归案后，第二审法院经过审理，如果认为被告人在第二审期间又犯新罪，可以依照刑事诉讼法第一百三十六条第（三）项的规定，发回原审人民法院重新审判，并由原审人民法院依照刑事诉讼法第一百二十三条第（三）项的规定，退回人民检察院补充侦查。
附：安徽省高级人民法院关于刑事被告人上诉后脱逃在程序上应当如何处理的请示报告 法研字（86）第15号
最高人民法院：
最近，我院收到阜阳地区中级人民法院关于刑事案件被告人上诉后脱逃应如何处理的请示报告。报告称：中级法院受理的王清军强奸上诉案，在审理期间（尚未提审），被告人王清军从看守所脱逃，至今仍未追捕归案，在此情况下，第二审法院应如何处理。他们提出两种意见，一是缺席判决；二是中止审理。经我院讨论研究，不同意缺席判决。如何办理有两种意见：第一种意见认为，被告人在上诉期间又犯脱逃罪，第二审法院可以参照刑事诉讼法第一百三十六条第三项“原判决事实不清楚或者证据不足的，可以在查清事实后改判；也可以裁定撤销原判，发回原审人民法院重新审判”的精神，裁定撤销原判，发回重审，由原审法院按照刑事诉讼法第一百二十三条第三项“合议庭认为案件证据不充分，或者发现新的事实，需要退回人民检察院补充侦查或自行调查”的规定，延期审理，退回检察院补充侦查、起诉。第二种意见认为，在第二审法院对本案尚未进行审理，第一审判罪是否成立以及脱逃罪能否构成不能确定的情况下，即撤销原判，将案件发回重新审理欠妥。可参照最高人民法院《关于人民法院审判严重刑事案件中具体应用法律的若干问题的答复（三）》第四十三条的意见，对本案决定中止审理。待被告人抓获后，再继续审理，并根据审理的情况，该判决就判决，该发回重审就发回重审。
哪种意见正确，请指示。
1986年9月27日
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
------An Analysis of the DSU in Positivism
by
Chengwei, Liu
Foreword
This book is a systematically selected compilation of Reports issued by various panels and the standing Appellate Body, then adopted by the DSB under the WTO jurisdiction by the end of May 2002, in category of subjects such as causes of action, initiation of panel proceedings, function of panels, rules of evidence and special rules governing anti-dumping disputes, etc., which are in most cases ruled as “preliminary issues” or “procedural objections”. However, this book is not intended to be exhaustive. It deals only with issues in dispute settlement proceedings under the WTO jurisprudence that the author considers the more important, where such rules are mainly concerned as Art. XXIII of the GATT 1994; Arts. 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 21.5, 23, 26 of the DSU; Arts. 17.4, 17.5, 17.6 of the AD Agreement and Arts. 31, 32 of the Vienna Convention and so on.
Moreover, this book is intended to be descriptive and positive rather than prescriptive and theoretical. Most of the author’s analysis benefits much from the precise and logically organized reports by panels and the Appellate Body, administered by the DSB under the WTO jurisdiction. It must be made clear that these reports do not constitute binding “subsequent practice” referred to in Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, nor do they operate as stare decisis, panels and the Appellate Body are therefore not bound by past reports. Nevertheless, it does be the case demonstrated by the DSB practice that, relevant reasoning in a particular case has been cited or followed frequently by another panel or confirmed by the Appellate Body in subsequent cases.
As ruled by the Appellate Body in Japan-Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages (DS44), “[a]dopted panel reports are an important part of the GATT acquis. They are often considered by subsequent panels. They create legitimate expectations among WTO Members, and, therefore, should be taken into account where they are relevant to any dispute”. Furthermore, a panel could nevertheless find useful guidance in the reasoning of an unadopted panel report when it considers relevant. More importantly, as stated in the letter with which the Appellate Body conveyed in the February of 1996 its Working Procedures for Appellate Review to the DSB for information, “… it is also important to ensure consistency and coherence in our decision-making, which is to the advantage of every WTO Member and the overall multilateral trading system we all share”.
There is no doubt that, in line with the pragmatic evolution of the GATT dispute settlement system, the progressive clarification of a number of issues that are not precisely regulated in the DSU and the further development of the WTO dispute settlement procedures, will gradually evolve after having been tested and progressively clarified and improved in concrete dispute settlement cases.
Considering all of this, the author complete this book with serious-minded exploring examination and great diligence, bearing in mind that it is therefore practical and of great significance for WTO Members to be informed of the valuable rulings in those reports issued by panels and the Appellate Body in particular cases.
List of Abbreviations
ATC Agreement on Textile and Clothing
BISD Basic Instruments and Selected Documents (published by GATT)
DSU Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing
the Settlement of Disputes
DSB Dispute Settlement Body
EC The European Communities
GATS General Agreement on Trade in Services
GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
IMF International Monetary Fund
PGE Permanent Group of Experts (in the SCM Agreement)
SCM Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
SG Agreement on Safeguards
SPS Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
TBT Technical Barriers to Trade
TMB Textiles Monitoring Body
TRIMS Trade-related Investment Measures
TRIPS Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
TSB Textiles Surveillance Body
WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization
WTO World Trade Organization
Table of Contents
Chapter I Trend towards “Judicialization”:
A Rule-oriented Dispute Settlement System
Chapter II Causes of Action before the DSB:
Art. XXIII of the GATT 1994
Section One Right to Pursue a Proceeding under the WTO
I The Concept of Nullification or Impairment
II The Standing Issue before the DSB
